'Green' Has Become Fabian Socialist 'Red'

January 26, 2012 sovereignindependent.co.uk
The likes of the right-of-political-centre UK Daily Telegraph’s Christopher Booker and James Delingpole have long been warning that the real political colour of so-called environmental groups is not ‘green’ but ‘red’ and that many environmentalists have a hidden agenda of leftist collectivism. Indeed, Delingpole recently authored/updated a must-read book on the subject entitled ‘Watermelons: The Green Movement’s True Colors’ / ‘Watermelons: How the Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, Destroying the Economy and Stealing Your Children’s Future’[1].

However, even elements of the liberal mainstream press in the UK now seem to be grudgingly acknowledging that ‘Green’ environmental groups are being observed to have “become” organs of Fabian ‘Red’ collectivism (if, in Gramsci[2] and Alinsky[3] style, their leaderships weren’t largely set up that way to start with). Thus in the UK, ‘The Independent’ newspaper has permitted guest writer Alexander Wickham to write “It seems that, increasingly, our Green Party is showing more of a resemblance to the Socialist Workers’ Party or UK Uncut than to an environmentalist movement.” Alexander Wickham, ‘When you think of a Green Party, what comes to mind?’The Independent, 24 January 2012:

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/01/24/when-you-think-of-a-green-part...

Wickham goes on to somewhat naively state “the environment should not be an issue of right or left. People of all political persuasions should be welcomed to support the ecological cause, not simply dyed-in-the-wool lefties.” With regard to Caroline Lucas, left-leaning UK Member of Parliament and leader of the Green Party of England and Wales, Wickham observes: “The fact that Ms. Lucas was one of the most popular speakers at the Fabian [Socialist] Society’s annual conference was hardly surprising.”

Wickham’s apparent (I will return to this point below) concern over Green Party association with an Socialism is well-justified. The Fabian strategy[4] is the military technique of gradually wearing down one’s opponents that is historically associated with Roman General Fabius Maximus[5] and applied in political terms by followers of Karl Marx and others. It was augmented with the technique of infiltration or ‘entryism’[6] by the likes of Gramsci and Trotsky[7]. Such techniques were also favoured by Saul Alinsky: and his de-facto heiress-presumptive, Hillary Rodham Clinton[8], amongst others. Moreover, the sinister wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing[9] motif of the Fabian Society is very revealing. In the view of many researchers of the ‘New World Order’, it signifies a predatory elitism that is quite different from the gradual introduction of commonly-defined ‘socialism’ (that falsely purports to be benevolent towards all of humanity).

The Fabian Society Stained-Glass Window[10], commissioned by George Bernard Shaw[11], shows Shaw and Sidney Webb[12] hammering the world into their chosen form. Their modus-operandi is to fool, co-opt and manipulate well-meaning liberals (or what Lenin and Stalin are reputed to have referred to as ‘poleznye idioty’ or ‘useful idiots’[13]) into helping implement something they do not fully understand. At the base of the window Shaw appears to be cajoling or mocking such useful idiots. The wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing shield is visible directly above the Fabian hammered globe.

In his lamentation over trends in the ‘green’ movement in The Independent, Alexander Wickham writes “Of course there is an important role for left-wing political parties in Britain. It is understandable that fringe parties might move to the left to fill the gap created by Labour. But it is a great shame if this happens at the expense of environmentalism. Sometimes in politics it is best to stick to what you know. The Green Party should go back to being green.” From such a statement however it is difficult to conclude whether Wickham is more concerned with the ‘green’ movement being found-out and exposed as red-collectivists than them actually being red-collectivists?

As an ex-environmental activist I would be the first to argue that we do indeed need a genuine non-aligned environmental movement to stand against industrialists that do not genuinely attempt to limit environmental pollution. The green movement however, has decidedly shifted from such a laudable role into a destructive anti-human pressure movement: hell-bent on reversing beneficial industrialisation, preventing third-world countries from meaningful development and effectively wishing to send most common people back to life as it was in the middle and stone ages in many respects. In the UK, the likes of the now defunct Sustainable Development Commission’s Professor Tim Jackson, with one Charles Prince of Wales as chief cheerleader, effectively want to destroy UK industry and material well-being and mask the fact with ‘spirit-level’ psychobabble: where common people are to be told there is more to life than material goods (as if we didn’t already know that) to help us reduce availability and use of such goods in the coming new age of ‘green austerity’. Translated into ‘oikspeak’ this means that you and I enjoy the ‘spiritual’ experience of communal omnibus travel while Charles Windsor presumably runs his Royal range rovers, trains, planes, helicopters and boats on biofuels. One could in some respects forgive such pointless anti-industrial lunacy if Prince Charles, heir to one of the world’s greatest fortunes, were to first reduce his own material well-being to precisely the level advocated for his future ‘subjects’.

The intellectual bankruptcy of such ‘green’ anti-industrialism is that it views human beings as just ‘consumers’, when we are in fact amazing producers as a speices. It also views the world as a closed energy/resource system when it is not. Pseudo-environmental anti-industrialism is utterly demolished in two absolute must-read books:

‘The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves’by Dr Matt Ridley[14]:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rational-Optimist-How-Prosperity-Evolves/dp/0007...

‘Ferraris For All: In Defence of Economic Progress’by Daniel Ben-Ami[15]:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Ferraris-All-Defence-Economic-Progress/dp/184742...

I do however believe that, in commendably and expertly explaining the virtues of freedom and productive industrial economies (virtues that, as pointed out, most of us unwisely take for granted and are in danger of losing), these two otherwise excellent authors (along with the aforementioned James Delingpole) make two fundamental mistakes:

Firstly, in my view, they underestimate the waste of human productive resource and the sheer human suffering that free-markets can cause in not sufficiently helping workers to continually adapt and retrain in growing and fast-changing economies. If you leave retraining (which is often very costly for employers who have no guarantees that, once trained, employees will not move on to work for a competitor) to ‘the market’ alone it is often delayed, inefficient and leads to under or unemployment that can be a breeding ground for precisely the kind of destructive Fabian nonsense that these, and this, author seeks to avoid.

Second; Ridley, Ben-Ami and Delingpole, all fail to fully understand and differentiate between constructive industrial and scientific progress in global food production and destructive corporatist monopoly. The fact is that there is a decades-long documented and eugenics-linked “food as a weapon” war that is centred around the Rockefeller/Kissinger axis every bit as much as the better-known drive to control and weaponise oil production. The food as a weapon agenda has increasingly controlled and monopolised global agriculture and distribution, grossly exaggerated Malthusian population and food concerns, harmed natural soil fertility and natural pest-control, and undermined more harmonious medium and large-scale agricultural methods. It has also used genetically modified organisms (GMOs) for disingenuous reasons in a global programme that may be a toxic Pandora’s-Box of fearful epic proportions. Like all monopolistic adventures, it is driven neither by efficiency or the best interests of humankind. An absolute must-read book on “food as a [globalist] weapon” to be read alongside those of Ridley and Ben-Ami is the eye-opening ‘Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation’by F William Engdahl[16]:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seeds-Destruction-Hidden-Genetic-Manipulation/dp...

There is in fact an elitist agenda to not only control food and oil, but everything and every one on planet earth. Such hubris is called a “scientific dictatorship” or global governance by a plutocratic elite. The modus operandi employed to gradually herd humanity into accepting such a dire future is the Hegelian false-flag problem-reaction-solution technique: false-flag terrorism in the case of the World Trade Centre on 11th September 2001 and false-flag economic sabotage presently raging throughout the world.

In the latter case, to use an analogy of a car as the global economy, with the driver being the capitalist financial markets: the establishment essentially wants us to believe that the massive global car-crash we’ve just witnessed is all the fault of a profit-drunk driver. The deeper truth is however that said car really crashed because an elite globalist political class had the brakes removed just prior to the “accident”. ‘Crash Investigators’ should therefore examine who was behind and who permitted recent key financial market deregulation: such as repeal of the 1932 US Glass–Steagall measures by the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act of 1999[17] and the similar mid-1980s ‘Big Bang’[18] deregulation in the City of London. By design, the people respond by getting angry with so-called free-market economics (via co-opted movements such as ‘Occupy Wall Street’ etc) and clamour for ‘something to be done’. The ‘something to be done’ calls are then met by a globalist ‘here’s one we prepared earlier’ ‘global problems need global solutions’ fix. Thus we are all inexorably moved along the internationalists’ conveyor-belt towards global collectivist governance: including a planned one-world banking system and one-world electronic cash-free currency. A concise absolute must-read book on this subject is entitled:

Crisis by Design: The Untold Story of the Global Financial Coup and What You Can Do About It, by John Truman Wolfe:

http://www.themoneymasters.com/430-2/

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Crisis-Design-Untold-Global-Financial/dp/0982201...

The planned global collectivism is intended to benefit an elite class at the expense of ordinary people, not to promote social justice and equality as Fabians misleadingly claim. Under such an end-game-solution meaningful mass-democracy will be dead and ongoing ‘eco-scam’ population reduction schemes will gain momentum: “… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.”[19].

The increasingly discredited ‘catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)’ theory needs to be viewed therefore in the context of the broader agenda of globalist elites. Returning to The Independent newspaper article by Alexander Wickham and his comment that “The Green Party should go back to being green”, I find it astonishing that such comment confines itself to the association of environmentalism with ‘socialism’ and makes no mention of the elephant-in-the-room that is environmentalism’s unfortunate association with discredited CAGW theory. Said theory is scientifically untenable[20] and has shown itself to be a prime example of what Professor Bruce Charlton identified as money-backed “Zombie Science” or “propaganda”[21]. Indeed, ‘green’ propaganda, with which a complicit BBC has been caught red-handed (pun intended), has been ably demonstrated by Andrew Montford in his must-read ‘Conspiracy in Green’ booklet[22]:

http://www.bishop-hill.net/conspiracy-in-green/

In spite of continuing increases in human-produced atmospheric carbon-dioxide the trend in average global warming temperatures came to a halt between 1998 and 2001 and then marginally declined. IPCC predicted temperature and sea-level rises failed to materialise and not only have climate modelling assumptions proved to be misplaced, there is good prima-facie evidence warranting formal investigation of scientific fraud by warmists. Under such circumstances it is astonishing that the ‘green’ movement continues to demonise entirely beneficial plant-food that carbon-dioxide is, argues for carbon-taxes, perpetuates the myth of peak-oil/energy and strives to block sensible energy policies that are the life-blood of modern industrial society. Such ‘green’ policy amounts to either malign or misplaced (depending on individuals’ degree of ‘useful idiocy’) global vandalism that has needlessly cost and is costing human lives.

In their present incarnation, ‘greens’ are not only ‘red’ by association with Fabian ‘socialist’ agendas, they are associated with the colour red because they effectively have blood on their hands. Warmist, anti-industrial ‘greens’ are tools of elite globalist eugenicists: whose real reason for wanting to reduce population numbers is fear of losing neo-feudalistic control to a developing and awakening mass humanity. Having had to abandon plans to co-opt the green movement with false fears of ‘the ice-age cometh’ because global temperatures rose in the 1980s, in their own words, globalist elites, through The Club of Rome, stated : “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, WE CAME UP WITH THE IDEA that pollution, the threat of GLOBAL WARMING, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” [capitalised emphasis added].[23]

There is a reason that such elites “came up with” such propaganda; In the words of George Herbert Walker Bush to the US Congress on September 11, 1991: “What is at stake, is more than one small country. It is a big idea, a New World Order…”

...
...
...
...

REFERENCES:

[1] ‘Watermelons: The Green Movement’s True Colors’ by James Delingpole, 2011. ISBN: 9-780-9833-4740-8. And see:

http://jamesdelingpole.com/

And the new 2012 version: ‘Watermelons: How the Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, Destroying the Economy and Stealing Your Children’s Future’ by James Delingpole, 2012. ISBN: 978-1849542173:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watermelons-Environmentalists-Destroying-Stealin...

[2] Antonio Gramsci (January 22, 1891 – April 27, 1937) – Founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy and one of the most important Marxist thinkers in the 20th century:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramsci

[3] Saul Alinsky (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972) – American community organizer and writer noted for his book ‘Rules for Radicals’ of which Alinsky writes, “What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_strategy

[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabius_Maximus

[6] ‘Entryism’ (or entrism or enterism) is a political tactic by which an organisation or state encourages its members or agents to infiltrate another organisation in an attempt to gain recruits, or take over entirely:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism

[7] For example, the ‘French Turn’ refers to the classic form of entryism advocated by Leon Trotsky in his essays on “the French Turn”: In June 1934, he proposed that the French Trotskyists dissolve their Communist League to join the French Section of the Workers’ International (SFIO) and that it also dissolve its youth section to join more easily with revolutionary elements. The tactic was adopted in August 1934, and was successful despite opposition:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Turn

[8] It is of note that Alinsky was the graduate thesis subject of latter-day internationalist power-broking, carbon-taxing Hillary Rodham Clinton:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_clinton

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals

[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wolf_in_Sheep%27s_Clothing

[10] https://sites.google.com/site/logansron/fight-the-nwo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Window

[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bernard_Shaw

[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Webb

[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiots

[14] ‘The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves’, by Dr Matt Ridley, 2010. ISBN: 978-0-00-737890-6. And see:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rational-Optimist-How-Prosperity-Evolves/dp/0007...

http://www.rationaloptimist.com/

[15] ‘Ferraris For All: In Defence of Economic Progress’ by Daniel Ben-Ami, 2010. ISBN: 978-1-84742-346-7. And see:

http://danielbenami.com/

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Ferraris-All-Defence-Economic-Progress/dp/184742...

[16] ‘Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation’ by F William Engdahl, 2007. ISBN: 978-0-9737147-2-2. And see:

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seeds-Destruction-Hidden-Genetic-Manipulation/dp...

[17] Glass–Steagall Act:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_steagall

[18] Big Bang (financial markets):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_%28financial_markets%29

[19] The Club of Rome, ‘Goals For Mankind’. See ‘The Green Agenda’ at:

http://green-agenda.com/index.html

[20] For scientific evidence debunking the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), see for example:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/

http://joannenova.com.au/

http://climatedepot.com/

http://www.thegwpf.org/

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/

http://www.repealtheact.org.uk/

[21] Professor Bruce Charlton ‘Zombie science: A sinister consequence of evaluating scientific theories purely on the basis of enlightened self-interest’ peer-reviewed paper. 2008, Published by Elsevier Ltd. Doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.018. A pdf version of the paper is freely available on various websites including the following link :

www.mantleplumes.org/WebDocuments/Charlton2008.pdf

Professor Charlton’s own blog is at:

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2009/08/zombie-science-of-evidence-...

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/

[22] ‘Conspiracy in Green’ booklet by Andrew Montford. 2011:

http://www.bishop-hill.net/conspiracy-in-green/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Montford

[23] Club of Rome. ‘The First Global Revolution’ (1991). Publisher: Pantheon; 1st edition (September 3, 1991):

http://www.archive.org/details/TheFirstGlobalRevolution

http://green-agenda.com/quoterefs.html

http://green-agenda.com

https://sites.google.com/site/logansron/greens-and-reds

...
...
...
...

Source: http://sovereignindependent.co.uk/2012/01/26/green-has-become-fabian-soc...

.
.
Global Warming is a Greencide Job : The Green Killer : Scores of Protected Golden Eagles Dying After Colliding with Wind Turbines
http://www.guerillamedia.co.nz/content/global-warming-greencide-job-gree...

http://www.guerillamedia.co.nz

http://www.naturalnews.com/